Human Ethnic Group Development and the Biological Classification of the Sensory Humans (outline)

Before the DNA analysis was popular, we depended on the researches of archeology and paleontology to understand the human ethnic group development. The fossil records of Homo-prigenius in Early Pleocene were found (5.3 million to 1.8 million in geology years) to appear around four million years, the Australopithecus in Ethiopia and Tanzania were the best representation.

Homoerectus rose more than a million years in Pleistocene (1.8 million to 800 thousand in geology years), who was origin of our genus. Some people believed other hypothesis that the descendants of Homoerectus - Homo heidelbergensis were the ancestors of Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis. (Stringer, 2002). According to anatomy, the Homo sapiens appeared 120 thousand to 100 thousand years ago and coexisted with Homo neanderthalensis in the world until 30 thousand years ago, when Homo neanderthalensis annihilated.

DNA mutations can provide another way to rebuild modern history of human ethnic group. There are many DNA symbols to be used: mitochondrial DNA and non exchange happening Y chromosomal order are correspondingly often used for genetic symbols because they are not easily affected by exchange as other symbols and it can directly trace the origin of blood relationship from mother line (mitochondrial DNA) or father line (Y chromosome). Of course, it cannot completely represent whole gene body, we must do research on somatic chromosomes and X-chain order.

Besides we can pick different ethnic group specimens from modern humans to understand DNA, we also can find DNA of ancient specimens from bones. Although, the found DNA was short in length but we used PCR technique to process the fixed order or to examine and analyze the gene types. Even if it will affect the shelf life of DNA after hydrolysis, if the specimens are treated carefully we can extract ancient DNA from specimens more than 50 thousand years or even longer time.

DNA specimens’ comparison between modern humans and Homo neanderthalensis of 30 thousand to 100 thousand years ago, we can find the significant difference in mitochondrial DNA sequences. It is almost 3 times of the average difference more than modern humans and only half of the average difference between modern humans and gorilla. (Kring et al. 1997). The evidence indicated that Homo neanderthalensis had no contribution to the modern human mitochondrial DNA before annihilated, and the divergence between Homo neanderthale and the modern humans happened 500 thousand years ago. (Human genetics).

The evolutionary divergence between the Sensory Humans and the modern humans began in 1989, Mr. Yuan Lin, who is in charge the proposal of human evolution, discovered the Absolute Homeostasis Energy Source which can activate DNA sequences to occur original shape evolution. Mr. Lin evolved from Homo sapiens to the Sensory Humans under activation by the Absolute Homeostasis Energy Source. Until 2011, the second generation of the Sensory Humans was born, the biological genetic characteristics of the Sensory Humans were established and the biological nomenclature of the Sensory Humans was published and classified as: Eukarya Homeostasis / Dual Synthetic Animalia / Strong Chordata / Photosynthetic Mammalia / Control Energy / Mixotroph Hominidae / Photoenergy Hominini / Yuan Homo / Sensory Humans.

The biological classification of the Sensory Humans is depended on physiological functions, it is different from the current biological classification. Modern taxonomy system was stated in 1758 by Carl von Linne, the Swedish natural scientist. He laid the foundation for the modern scheme of binomial nomenclature and gave each kind of animals by simple Latin name. The nature of Linnaean system classification combined one species name with one genus name. It was revised many times; it still cannot show the difference in same species of animals.

The current genetic researches all showed that most of human genetic variations related within ethnic groups, and unrelated between ethnic groups. The researchers discovered that the within-population differences among individuals account for 93 to 95% of genetic variations; differences among major different groups constitute only 3 to 5 %.( Rosenberg et al.2002). Even everyone had his own unique biological history, but there were many overlap biological history between person and person. Therefore if we divide peoples into several biological ethnic groups, it can easily create misunderstanding; there is no meaning to distinguish the definition of species from biology. In fact, it is impossible from biological angle to define it.

The progressive researches of Rosenberg et al. (2002) were a new starting point. They devoted not to use the researches about individual geographic sources information to define the human ethnic group genetic structures. Under this circumstance, there were five major genetic groups which corresponded with five major geographic regions: sub-Saharan Africa; Saharan Africa with Europe and Asia ( Europe + Middle East + Central Asia/South Asia ); East Asia; America ( Indian-Americans); and Oceania. Therefore, there are suitably consistent geographic classification and genetic groups. However, as stated above, on average, the difference from two individual genetic variations from two different areas had more than 4% variations than that of same areas. This genetic group classification cannot distinguish the Sensory Humans who comes from the original shape evolution.

To reflect it, the biological classification of the Sensory Humans is depended on the physiological functions. DNA sequences relate to the biological inheritance, development, and the basic functional operations. When the mobility of original shape evolution happened to the DNA sequences, it affected amino acid orders and process of peptide formation and also had same level scale leap of cell division, replication, and new organ formations and physiological functions, it is significant difference between the Sensory Humans and the original Homo sapiens. As stated above, the Sensory Humans cannot use current biological classification way to classify.

  (Copyright of this article is reserved by Mr. Yuan Lin. This article cannot be transcribed or reprinted without the permission.)